Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Lesson 12 Reflection (Brendan)
We do not have much time to do the our product because many of us aren't able to stay back after school. Our form teacher always make us stay back for recess and after school. The past week have also been busy and as there have been school events like NAPFA on thursday and friday.
The group has discussed and decided that suta and I would be making the characters and the background. Thus, the both of us have already discussed about the different ideas on the characters background. After doing that, we would be able to put it into our product.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Lesson 12 Reflection (Tai Jun Rong 34)
Firstly, one of the difficulties is time constraint. Last week, we had to stay back almost everyday, due to CCAs, Napfa Test and some extra classes held by teachers. We could also do it during reccess time but Ms Lum, our form teacher made us stay back for every reccess for about 10-15minutes, and after finished eating, we would be left with no more than 10minutes time to complete our project.
Next, is how I have contributed to the project. I gave our group leader, Dominic Ss, some improvements and initiated some ideas. For example, I told them to plot a line graph on how the temperature and the carbon emissions have increased for the past ten years. I find that this form of graph, the line graph, is more efficient than other forms of graph like the pie chart and the bar graph.
V-Formation Guys!
Lesson 12 reflection (Jun Xiang)™
Lesson 12 Reflection(Dominic)
We have started working on the comic prototype. We have divided our jobs equally among our members. I would be doing the characters with Brendan and the whole group did the story information and we would finalise the prototype on Monday.
What I find most difficulty was we only had 6 days to complete the prototype. And all of us had NAPFA and CCA on this week so It was hard for us to find the time to discuss about the prototype.
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
reflection 11{gregory}
2. What you think the direction your group should be taking?
- we are going to improve our lifestyle a nd improve our way of living till it is comfortable and would be eco-friendly.and thus we are going to make the world a green place to live in.
3. What you have learnt about the product?
- there is nothing much to learn about it although there will be a lot of information about the greenhouse effect and how do we work our way against it.
4. What would you be doing to improve on the product?
- i would like to make our product a continuous one where we can make different episodes of our comic strip to bring the reading to want to know more about global warming and greenhouse gases
Monday, April 19, 2010
Lesson 11 Reflection (Brendan)
Sunday, April 18, 2010
Researched on Climate Changed Edited(Dominic)
Direct health impacts (heat, extreme events, etc.)
Scientists believe that the increased levels of carbon dioxide could cause increased temperatures, changed weather patterns, and rising sea levels.
Reflection week 11 (Dominic)
I knew that it would be a comic done by BannedStory (an application) to inform the other students about how important it is to prevent global warming and the effects of global warming.
2. What you think the direction your group should be taking.
I think we are doing well heading toward our goal. Since all team members are showing high enthusiasm doing the project research, we would come up with a good comic in no time with everyone putting in their best efforts
3. What you have learnt about the product.
I learnt that BannedStory are great at making comic, it could be able to generate characters and even background pictures too. We have not started on the script yet but I know that the group would work together and produce a detailed and easy to understand comic.
4. What you would be doing to improve on the product.
Firstly, I would do more research and finds out more details about effect global warming that are not commonly available, so the reader would not find the story of the comic boring.
Secondly, I would ask teachers for guidance after finishing the script to make sure there is no error and the story is knowledgeable as to ensure that the reader would enjoy the story and learn about global warming at the same time and have a long and lasting positive impact on their lifestyle.
Saturday, April 17, 2010
Lesson 11 Reflection (Tai Jun Rong 34)
- It helps to educate the young on global warming
2. What direction your group should be taking?
- We should be well finished with the project in the coming weeks. (Goal: A week after SA1)
Whht have you learnt about the product?
- The product requires much data and time to have it completed.
What will you be doing to improve the product?
- Summarise the words of the product an omit unneccesary data so that the reader will not be bored.
-Make the research paper and the comic life more interesting (eg. print out in colour, add more pictures) to attract people's attention.L
Wednesday, April 14, 2010
Lesson 11 reflection (Jun xiang ™)
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Product for Global Warming
research [Gregory]
The world's most common greenhouse gases are:
water vapor
carbon dioxide
Atmospheric methane
nitrous oxide
ozone
chloroflorocarbons
carbon dioxide, which contributes 9–26%
methane, which contributes 4–9%
ozone, which contributes 3–7%
The greenhouse effect is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by gases in the atmosphere warm a planet's lower atmosphere and surface. It was discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824 and was first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896. Existence of the greenhouse effect as such is not disputed, even by those who do not agree that the recent temperature increase is attributable to human activity. The question is instead how the strength of the greenhouse effect changes when human activity increases the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Global warming
Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of Earth's near-surface air and oceans since the mid-20th century and its projected continuation. Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) between the start and the end of the 20th century. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the 20th century was very likely caused by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases resulting from human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation. The IPCC also concludes that variations in natural phenomena such as solar radiation and volcanic eruptions had a small cooling effect after 1950. These basic conclusions have been endorsed by more than 40 scientific societies and academies of science, including all of the national academies of science of theProxy-Connection: keep-alive
Cache-Control: max-age=0
ajor industrialized countries.
Adaptation to Global warming
wide variety of measures have been suggested for adaptation to global warming, including: water conservation, water rationing, adaptive agricultural practices, including diversification, construction of flood defenses, changes to medical care, and interventions to protect threatened species. The capacity and potential for human systems to adapt is unevenly distributed across different regions and populations. The economic costs of adaptation are potentially large, but also largely unknown. Across the literature, there is wide agreement that adaptation will be more difficult for larger magnitudes and higher rates of climate change.
the scientific prediction come true
Scientists in the 1970s started to shift from the uncertain leanings in the 1960s to increasingly a prediction of future warming. A survey of the scientific literature from 1965 to 1979 found 7 articles predicting cooling and 44 predicting warming, with the warming articles also being cited much more often in subsequent scientific literature.
Several scientific panels from this time period concluded that more research was needed to determine whether warming or cooling was likely, indicating that the trend in the scientific literature had not yet become a consensus. On the other hand, the 1979 World Climate Conference of the World Meteorological Organization concluded "it appears plausible that an increased amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere can contribute to a gradual warming of the lower atmosphere, especially at higher latitudes....It is possible that some effects on a regional and global scale may be detectable before the end of this century and become significant before the middle of the next century."
The mainstream news media at the time did not reflect scientific opinion. In 1975, Newsweek magazine published a story that warned of "ominous signs that the Earth's weather patterns have begun to change," and reported "a drop of half a degree [Fahrenheit] in average ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968." The article continued by stating that evidence of global cooling was so strong that meteorologists were having "a hard time keeping up with it." On October 23, 2006, Newsweek issued an update stating that it had been "spectacularly wrong about the near-term future".
Since about 1750 human activity has increased the concentration of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Measured atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide are currently 100 ppmv higher than pre-industrial levels. Natural sources of carbon dioxide are more than 20 times greater than sources due to human activity, but over periods longer than a few years natural sources are closely balanced by natural sinks such as weathering of continental rocks and photosynthesis of carbon compounds by plants and marine plankton. As a result of this balance, the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide remained between 260 and 280 parts per million for the 10,000 years between the end of the last glacial maximum and the start of the industrial era.
In Asia, atmospheric levels of CO2 continue to rise, partly a sign of the industrial rise of Asian economies led by China. Over the 2000–2010 interval China is expected to increase its carbon dioxide emissions by 600 Mt, largely because of the rapid construction of old-fashioned power plants in poorer internal provinces.
potential global warming
The global warming potential (GWP) depends on both the efficiency of the molecule as a greenhouse gas and its atmospheric lifetime. GWP is measured relative to the same mass of CO2 and evaluated for a specific timescale. Thus, if a gas has a high GWP on a short time scale (say 20 years) but has only a short lifetime, it will have a large GWP on a 20 year scale but a small one on a 100 year scale. Conversely, if a molecule has a longer atmospheric lifetime than CO2 its GWP will increase with the timescale considered.
Examples of the atmospheric lifetime and GWP for several greenhouse gases include:
Carbon dioxide has a variable atmospheric lifetime, and cannot be specified precisely. Recent work indicates that recovery from a large input of atmospheric CO2 from burning fossil fuels will result in an effective lifetime of tens of thousands of years.Carbon dioxide is defined to have a GWP of 1 over all time periods.
Methane has an atmospheric lifetime of 12 ± 3 years and a GWP of 72 over 20 years, 25 over 100 years and 7.6 over 500 years. The decrease in GWP at longer times is because methane is degraded to water and CO2 through chemical reactions in the atmosphere.
Nitrous oxide has an atmospheric lifetime of 114 years and a GWP of 289 over 20 years, 298 over 100 years and 153 over 500 years.
CFC-12 has an atmospheric lifetime of 100 years and a GWP of 11000 over 20 years, 10900 over 100 years and 5200 over 500 years.
HCFC-22 has an atmospheric lifetime of 12 years and a GWP of 5160 over 20 years, 1810 over 100 years and 549 over 500 years.
Tetrafluoromethane has an atmospheric lifetime of 50,000 years and a GWP of 5210 over 20 years, 7390 over 100 years and 11200 over 500 years.
Hexafluoroethane has an atmospheric lifetime of 10,000 years and a GWP of 8630 over 20 years, 12200 over 100 years and 18200 over 500 years.
Sulphur hexafluoride has an atmospheric lifetime of 3,200 years and a GWP of 16300 over 20 years, 22800 over 100 years and 32600 over 500 years.
Nitrogen trifluoride has an atmospheric lifetime of 740 years and a GWP of 12300 over 20 years, 17200 over 100 years and 20700 over 500 years.
week 10 reflection [gregory]
two things i found interesting--
i found out that global wrming is happening even as we speak and will not stop until we stop being so waste full and stop creating greenhouse gases.
i found that the research will have to be done by next week and it would be intereseting to read and digest from these researches.
it was difficult to do the reasearch cause my internet was down and there was not enough time to finish.
Research on Global Warming (Brendan)
Sunday, April 11, 2010
Research on Climate Change (Dominic)
Introduction
I am a student of Maris Stellla high school doing a research on Climate Changes. We were supposed to choose a topic and find out more about it. After researching, we were supposed to choose a product that we want to make and present about our finding.
My group name is V Formation and my group members are (Dominic SS),(Jun Rong), (Jun Xiang), (Brendan Tan) and (Gregory Tay). We have chosen Global warming for the main topic, and how greenhouse gases contribute to it for the sub topic. As for our product, we have decided to do a comic strip to educate the public more about global warming and research paper to educate the public about what we have found out during the project.
Findings
What is green house effect?
Energy from the sun drives the earth's weather and climate, and heats the earth's surface; in turn, the earth radiates energy back into space. Atmospheric greenhouse gases (water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other gases) trap some of the outgoing energy, retaining heat somewhat like the glass panels of a greenhouse.
What caused Global warming?
Natural changes in climate take place over many years; this allows animals and plants to adapt to new environments. Scientists have discovered that the earth’s temperature is increasing too rapidly and that’s due to the amount of Carbon Dioxide that is released in to the atmosphere.
The primary factors underlying environmental degradation include: economic growth, broad technological changes, demographic shifts and governance structures. These can give rise to:
Increased demand for natural resources and energy
Market imperfections, e.g., subsidies that lead to the inefficient use of resources and act as a barrier to the market penetration of climate sound technologies; the lack of recognition of the true value of natural resources; failure to appropriate the global values of natural resources to the local level; and the failure to internalize the social costs of environmental degradation into the market price of a resource
Limited availability and transfer of technology, inefficient use of technologies, and inadequate investment in research and development for the technologies of the future
–Failure to manage adequately the use of natural resources and energy
The sun’s rays penetrate our atmosphere and keep the planet warm. Unfortunately because the Earth’s big gassy blanket is so thick, no heat can escape. The Earth retains the suns heat causing the planet to warm up more quickly than it should.
What is Global Warming?
The Earths surface temperature has been slowly increasing for the last 15,000 years, since the last Ice age.
Global warming simply refers to an increase in temperature of the Earths surface.
What are some solutions for reducing the impact of transportation on climate change?
Effect of global warming
Scientists believe that the increased levels of carbon dioxide could cause increased temperatures, changed weather patterns, and rising sea levels.
Other Greenhouse gases include: methane, nitrous oxides, water vapor, and chlorofluorocarbons.
The amount of carbon in the atmosphere has increased by 31% since the start of the industrial revolution in 1750. Levels of Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere are at record highs (higher than any level over the past 420,000 years). Furthermore, the 1990s was the warmest decade since the start of reliable temperature data, possibly the warmest decade in the last 1,000 years.
Most scientists have looked at the increase in greenhouse gas levels, coupled with rising average surface temperatures and decreasing snow and ice coverage, as evidence of the effects of “anthropogenic greenhouse gases” (Source: Third IPCC Report).
The impacts of global warming could have severe consequences for human activities. Many of the consequences have environmental, economic, and health impacts. The changed temperatures and weather patterns can disrupt farming practices across nations, making areas that were once fertile no longer suitable for crop production. Changing temperatures might allow for the spread of tropical diseases, such as malaria, into areas that were at one time too cold to provide a suitable environment in which the disease could thrive. The increased temperatures could lead to heat waves that could threaten at-risk populations (especially the elderly, children, and the sick. As an example, consider the heat waves that hit France in the summer of 2003 and the heat waves in India). Rising sea levels could flood coastal cities. Changed weather patterns and increased temperatures might make natural catastrophes, such as hurricanes, more frequent and more severe. These last two impacts have the potential to cause a great deal of economic damage to the world’s economies. From an environmental standpoint, the changed climate patterns could disrupt the natural habitats of various species that may lead to certain extinctions.
The effect of a change in the weather on plant growth may lead to some countries not having enough food. Brazil, parts of Africa, Southeast Asia and China will be affected the most and many people could suffer from hunger.
Higher sea levels will threaten the low-lying coastal areas of the world, such as the Netherlands and Bangladesh. Throughout the world, millions of people and areas of land will be at danger from flooding. Many people will have to leave their homes and large areas of farmland will be ruined because of floods. In Britain, East Anglia and the Thames estuary will be at risk from the rising sea.
Global average temperatures are expected to increase by about 2-13°F (1-7°C) by the end of the century. That may not sound like a lot, so what’s the big deal? The problem is that small changes in global average temperature can lead to really large changes in the environment. Let’s look at some of the expected changes.
The main tools for both past and present climate analyses are computer climate models. Much like the models used to forecast weather, climate models simulate the climate system with a 3-dimensional grid that extends through the land, ocean, and atmosphere. The grid may have 10 to 60 different levels in the atmosphere and surface grid spacing of about 60 by 90 miles (100 by 150 km)—the size of Connecticut. The models perform trillions of calculations that describe changes in many climate factors in the grid
Sea-level rise projections: a few inches to a few feet
•2 ft: U.S. would lose 10,000 square miles
•3 ft: Would inundate Miami
•Affects erosion, loss of wetlands, freshwater supplies
•Half of the world’s population lives along coasts
Big question: Ice sheets
How to prevent global warming?
There are lots of things each one of us can do to help combat Global Warming. You can start by always switching lights off when you leave a room.
•Currently, the production of hydrogen fuel uses fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are used to separate hydrogen from the other atoms that it is bonded with—a process called electrolysis. When scientists discover a way to power electrolysis with alternative forms of energy -- such as hydro, wind, solar, or biomass sources -- hydrogen has the potential to be renewable and free of emissions at both the consumption and production ends.
•Hydrogen is the ideal fuel for fuel cells. These cells convert chemicals directly into electricity with a high level of efficiency. Fuel cells are already being used for military purposes and space flights; further research is needed before they are economically competitive with the existing technology.
•Hydrogen fuel cells produce water vapor as their byproduct—they are a very clean source of fuel. Disadvantages: Hydrogen fuel cells are currently handicapped by a high cost, the need for large storage containers to hold the hydrogen on the vehicle, the difficulty of obtaining pure hydrogen, and the challenge of undergoing electrolysis (splitting the hydrogen atoms) by efficiently using alternative fuel sources.
Ethanol is produced from fermented corn. Most cars with little engine modification to reduce ghg emissions can use ethanol blends—gasoline plus 5-20% ethanol—. However, the procedure to produce ethanol is very energy intensive and requires the use of fossil fuels. Several transit agencies have experimented with ethanol buses. Their results prove that the buses consume more fuel and end up costing too much. The buses consume more fuel because the energy content of ethanol is lower than regular fuels. The high cost makes it unlikely that ethanol will ever become a widely used alternative for conventional fuel.
Reducing our greenhouse gas emissions and our use of fossil fuels will not be easy, but it is doable. Here’s how some researchers at Princeton view it.
Our current path is toward doubling CO2 emissions in the next 50 years, with even greater increases beyond that. In order to get off this path, we need to find ways to keep emissions constant for the next 50 years and then reduce them during the second half of the century. This would [9] limit atmospheric CO2 to about 570 ppm—still greater than the roughly 380 ppm in the atmosphere today, but enough to avoid the worst predicted consequences.
A majority (60%) of carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector come from personal vehicle use. Encouraging the use and development of public transportation reduces the number of cars on the road and reduces total greenhouse gas emissions.
Many communities do not carefully plan for growth. Carefully planned growth should take into account transportation options so that public transit and alternative forms of transportation can access the neighborhoods easily. Also, neighborhoods should heed the need to use transportation. Businesses, stores, and homes can all be located in the same area, often connected by bike paths and walkways. These planned neighborhoods use land efficiently; because of this, it is possible to drive direct routes (this reduces the amount of fuel wasted and thus reduces the amount of overall GHGs released).
If you are going to drive, don’t drive alone. By sharing a ride, you get to have company and help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by limiting the number of cars on the road.
By making sure your car is in tip-top shape, you can reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Cars that are well kept increase fuel efficiency.
New technologies provide another way to reduce emissions. Currently, research is focused on replacing petroleum-based fuels and increasing fuel efficiencies.
Once individuals are aware of how their transportation choices contribute to global climate change, hopefully they will change their habits to reduce emissions.
Most of the rubbish we throw away can be recycled, such as glass bottles and jars, steel and aluminium cans, plastic bottles and waste paper.
Recycling used materials uses less energy than making new ones.
Ask your parents if you have Energy Saving Bulbs in your house, they last much longer than ordinary household bulbs and use much less energy so they are better for the environment.
•Switch lights off when you leave the room.
•Don’t leave anything on standby.
•Walk rather than use the car when possible.
•Cycle more, use you body’s own energy.
•Recycle as much as possible.
To switch equipment off properly it needs to be turned off at the plug.
When you switch off the television with the remote control your TV
Automatically goes into standby or ‘sleep mode’. In ‘sleep mode’ the
TV is still using electricity even though you aren’t watching it.
Of course, you don’t have to take transit or drive to travel from one place to another. Sometimes, the old fashioned methods work out the best in the end anyway. Walking, biking, rollerblading, skateboarding, and other similar activities have almost no impact on the environment. They also have substantial health benefits. Just make sure that you do it safely! For people who live in areas that lack public transportation, walking or biking is a great alternative for individuals who do not want to rely on a personal car. These old fashioned gentlemen were eco-friendly before it was hip to be “green.”
Unplug appliances or plug into a power strip and switch it off
Buy water-saving appliances and toilets; installing low-flow shower heads.
Alcohols can be blended with petroleum fuels as “replacement” fuels this is sometimes called gasohol. No infrastructure change is thus necessary for alcohol. It is compatible with the ubiquitous existing fuel distribution and retailing systems and thus does not have to overcome the transitional barriers faced by alternative fuels.
Public transportation releases fewer greenhouse gas emissions into the air per person than driving does.
§Taking a train or bus is much cheaper than owning a car, and you don’t have to find a parking space once you get to your destination!
Compressed natural gas has been successfully used by transit agencies in New York and Los Angeles. It is gaining popularity across the country because it reduces the emissions of particulate matter and nitrous oxides—two air pollutants that cause much of the urban air pollution. However, CNG may not be effective at reducing GHGs. First of all, CNG’s buses tend to be less efficient than diesel, requiring them to consume more fuel. They are also heavier (CNG requires a heavier fuel tank to keep natural gas pressurized), which again means that they consume more fuel. And most importantly, there is an increase in methane emissions. Methane, a GHG, is much more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide. Therefore, a decrease in CO2 emissions can be offset by a very small increase in methane emissions. Transit agencies view CNG as a transitional fuel choice; the most promising replacements for CNG buses are hybrid-electric buses.